Yeah, this definitely isn’t as cut and dry as the last two debates. I do think Vance seemed more poised and, well, cool. Walz is a great speaker, but his schoolteacher vibes I think can be a little offputting....
Vance seems extremely well prepared and confident, guessing that reflects on his intelligence and work ethic. Walz is getting stronger as the debate goes on, I think that reflects his determination.
Vance is a smart guy, and very analytical. He is is responding to the questions with information in his brain, not with rehearsed marketing answers. Seems like Walz is at least better than Harris on his feet and is responding with information he believes rather than rehearsed...